How Slack Beat Email, A Love Letter to UX Research Done Right
- Himanshu Singh
- Apr 24
- 4 min read
Once upon a time, email was king.
It was the bloodstream of businesses.
The central nervous system of work.
The default way millions of humans connected, collaborated, coordinated.
And then came Slack — a tiny startup with no grand illusions of “killing email.”
They just wanted to make talking to your team feel better.
Fast-forward a decade:
12+ million daily active users
A $27.7 billion acquisition by Salesforce
A total redefinition of how businesses communicate
All because Slack understood something that most businesses still miss:
Success isn’t about features. It’s about feelings.
And the only way to truly design for feelings?
Relentless UX research and design.
Slack’s Secret Weapon — Listening Harder Than Anyone Else
From day one, Stewart Butterfield (Slack’s co-founder) believed something radical:
You don’t build the right product by brainstorming in a conference room.
You build it by obsessively studying how people actually struggle.
Before a single line of Slack’s code was written, the team interviewed hundreds of potential users.
Not with surveys.
Not with big, flashy decks.
But with empathetic listening.
They watched how teams communicated.
They mapped pain points with precision.
They noticed tiny, invisible irritations:
The agony of bloated email threads
The chaos of CCs and BCCs gone wrong
The dread of missing crucial updates buried in inbox noise
Slack didn’t invent communication.
They simply designed a better emotional experience around it.
And that difference wasn’t small.
It was seismic.
UX Research, Seeing What Competitors Were Blind To
Other tech giants had access to the same information.
Microsoft, Google, IBM — all had email systems.
All knew that team communication was messy.
But they didn’t feel it.
Slack didn’t just identify technical problems.
They identified emotional gaps:
“I feel overwhelmed.”
“I feel disconnected from my team.”
“I feel anxious about missing something important.”
Great UX research services aren’t about finding what users say they want.
It’s about finding the pain they can’t articulate — but live with every day.
Slack’s team understood this.
They didn’t build faster email.
They built emotional clarity:
Channels instead of confusing CCs
Reactions instead of long reply-alls
Threads instead of messy forwarded chains
Every design decision?
Rooted in observed user frustration.
Validated by relentless real-world testing.
UX Design That Doesn’t Just Work — It Works, Emotionally
Most products are designed to function.
Few products are designed to feel like a relief.
Slack’s UX design wasn’t just clean and colourful.
It was strategically empathetic:
Friendly tone of voice (“You’re all caught up!”)
Light-hearted micro copy (“No messages. Enjoy your day!”)
Playful touches that made communication feel less like work and more like conversation
This is what smart founders building products for humans must internalize:
Your UX isn’t just an interface. It’s an emotional thermostat.
When you hire a UX design studio, you’re not just paying for wireframes.
You’re paying for emotional architecture:
How will users feel at their most stressed?
How will users feel when they succeed?
How will users feel when they fail?
Slack didn’t leave these questions to chance.
They designed through them.
And it changed everything.
The Invisible Problems Slack Solved (That Email Never Could)
Ask a casual observer what Slack does, and they’ll say:
"It';s like chat for work"
But that’s the surface.
Underneath, Slack solved invisible, insidious problems email created:
The anxiety of missing out:
Slack’s real-time updates created a sense of presence without pressure.
The fatigue of formal communication:
Casual channels allowed natural, human conversations at work.
The fragmentation of information:
Searchable history made knowledge easily retrievable — no more digging through
chaotic inboxes.
The paralysis of CC/BCC politics:
Public channels removed the passive-aggressiveness that emails encouraged.
These aren’t “features.”
They are human needs, quietly and carefully served.
Visual design services played a huge role too — crafting an aesthetic that made digital
conversation feel warm, alive, and personal.
What Modern Founders Must Learn From Slack
The lesson isn’t that you should build the next Slack.
The lesson is:
If you listen better, you will build better.
Slack didn’t win because they had better engineers.
They won because they had better empathy pipelines.
If you’re building a product today — especially one that touches real human behaviour —
you must:
Invest in serious UX research before you build.
Map emotional friction, not just feature gaps.
Design for feelings first, functionality second.
Partner with teams who understand that design without research is just decoration.
Whether you’re a startup founder or a product owner at a mid-sized company, this is non-
negotiable.
Because someone out there — maybe right now — is designing the emotional version of your product.
And if you stay stuck in functionality, you’ll lose.
The Payoff of Obsessive UX Research
Today, Slack is more than just a tool.
It’s a workplace culture.
It’s where:
Jokes happen
Celebrations happen
Bad news is softened
Good news spreads like wildfire
This didn’t happen because of marketing.
It happened because Slack designed for how humans actually live and feel at work.
Founders, listen closely:
UX research isn’t an expense. It’s your path to emotional monopoly.
It’s what turns users into loyalists.
It’s what turns products into habits.
It’s what turns tools into cultures.
And it always starts the same way:
By watching closely.
By listening harder.
By caring more about your users’ hidden struggles than your roadmap’s next feature.
Slack cared.
And they didn’t just change workplace communication.
They rewrote the very idea of what a “work tool” could feel like.
Comments